Opportunity mapping
Walk the chosen workflow end-to-end. Surface every step that's repetitive, slow, or low-judgement — the places where AI earns its keep — and the steps where humans must stay.
Hands-on Workshops
A single focused session where your team works on its actual material. You leave with a working prototype, a playbook, and a 30/60/90 adoption plan.

The framework
You pick a workflow your team actually does — campaign reporting, contract review, candidate screening, monthly reconciliation — and we walk it through these six steps together. You leave with the workflow rebuilt, prompts in hand, and a plan to embed it.
Walk the chosen workflow end-to-end. Surface every step that's repetitive, slow, or low-judgement — the places where AI earns its keep — and the steps where humans must stay.
Design the AI-assisted version of the workflow. Inputs, outputs, where the model fits, where the human reviews, what the new flow looks like end-to-end.
What's safe to put into a public model and what isn't. How to handle confidential data, regulated content, and outputs you can't verify. The team leaves with a written checklist.
Move past one-shot prompts. Build a small library of prompts the team can reuse on this workflow every week — practiced live on real material.
Decide which tools serve this workflow best — and which add noise. Where possible, we stay inside your existing stack instead of adding new vendors.
Set the few signals that tell you whether the new workflow actually stuck — time saved, output quality, team confidence — without survey theatre.
A real example
The team picked their slowest recurring task: pulling data from four dashboards, copy-pasting into a deck, writing the narrative by hand. Two days, every month, similar shape. We walked the workflow through all six steps. Here’s what each step looked like.
We walked through the current monthly-report flow — pulling numbers from four dashboards, copying them into slides, then hand-writing the narrative. The narrative was the bottleneck: two days every month, similar shape, and the team's most senior person doing the writing.
We designed the new flow: humans still pull the data; AI drafts the narrative against a structured template; the marketing lead reviews, sharpens, and ships. Same outputs, a fraction of the time.
We agreed the rules. What's fine for a public model: anonymized performance numbers, generic competitive context. What isn't: client names, internal targets, unreleased creative. The team left with a one-page checklist.
We built three reusable prompts: one for performance summaries, one for trend narratives, one for stakeholder messaging. The team practiced each on the previous month's real data, refined the wording together, and saved them to a shared library.
For this workflow, Claude handled the narrative (long context, careful tone). The data summarization step stayed in the team's existing BI tool. No new vendors, no new approvals — just better use of what they had.
We set two signals: time-to-report (before vs after), and a team confidence score at month one and month three. Six weeks in, the report was taking half a day instead of two. The narrative still sounded like the team — it just wasn't taking the team's time anymore.
How it works
A free 30-minute call to understand your team, the workflows under pressure, and what would make the day worth it.
We pick the modules that match your team and pre-collect the workflows everyone will work on during the session.
Six to eight hours, hands-on, with your real material. You leave with a prototype, a playbook, and a 30/60/90 plan.
Format
Who this is for
FAQ
Next step
A short call — you describe your team and what’s under pressure. We send a tailored proposal within one business day, or tell you honestly if a workshop isn’t the right intervention.